How John Paulson Had The Greatest Trade Ever in Subprime Mortgage Crisis

68

By billyaustindillon

The Greatest Trade Ever

John Paulson and The Greatest Trade Ever is the story of the subprime crisis biggest bet. So who is the man who made a billion dollars from the CDO that is subject to the SEC v. Goldman Sachs fraud case. John Paulson was not charged in the Goldman case.The man is John Paulson and his success from trading against the subprime crisis has been called ‘The greatest trade ever”. To understand the subprime crisis and the deviousness of investment banks like what Goldman Sachs is accused of one needs to understand John Paulson and the greatest trade ever.

Wall Street Journal reporter Gregory Zuckerman last year published a book about the hedge fund manager John Paulson in his book The Greatest Trade Ever (The Behind-the-Scenes story of How John Paulson Defied Wall Street and Made Financial History).

Basically John Paulson made his multi-billion fortune by shorting the US housing markets by taking a huge CDS position (Credit Default Swaps). CDS were to gain infamy as they enabled the global financial crisis and the massive multi-billion bailouts. Paulson was the exception as he was on the right side of the trade.

Paulson's Profits

What I like about the book is it doesn’t glorify Paulson or vilify him as some modern day Gordon Gekko it shows him an insightful, knowledge trader who was relentless in the application of his plan to short the US subprime housing market. The Greatest Trade ever you down the path of Paulson and others who took the other side of the subprime trade and made tens of billions.

How big were the profits, well to quote Zuckerman;

" Paulson’s winnings were so enormous they seemed unreal, even cartoonish. His firm, Paulson & Co., made $15 billion in 2007, a figure that topped the gross domestic products of Bolivia, Honduras, and Paraguay…Paulson’s personal cut was nearly $4 billion…more than the earnings of J.K. Rowling, Oprah Winfrey, and Tiger Woods put together.”

** As a post note Paulson added another $5 billion into Paulson & Co. profits and another $2 billion to his personal account over 2008 and early 2009. That is he made over $20 billion on the greatest trade ever

How to Trade Credit Default Swaps and Credit Derivatives 

John Paulson The Greatest Ever Trade
John Paulson The Greatest Ever Trade

How Housing Bubbles Form

Paulson’s basis for the trade was simple enough, American real estate prices had diverged from their historical way outside the norm. Charts were put together by former Paulson & Co analyst and later snitch Paolo Pellegrini.

The book ‘The Greatest trade also tells of other individuals who were setting up the same trade. The other traders in the book are of Jeffrey Greene, Michael Burry, and Andrew Lahde (he of the infamous 'F*ck you' goodbye letter to Wall Street).

From ‘The Greatest Trade

“This is crazy,” Mr. Paulson said to Paolo Pellegrini, one of his analysts.

Paulson’s response was to have Pellegrini look at the long term returns on house prices:

The answer was in front of him: Housing prices had climbed a puny 1.4% annually between 1975 and 2000, after inflation. But they had soared over 7% in the following five years, until 2005. The upshot: U.S. home prices would have to drop by almost 40% to return to their historic trend line. Not only had prices climbed like never before, but Mr. Pellegrini’s figures showed that each time housing had dropped in the past, it fell through the trend line, suggesting that an eventual drop likely would be brutal.

Paulson decided he wanted to bet that house prices would regress to the mean, but how to find the right instrument to allow him to do that:

By the spring, Mr. Paulson was convinced he had discovered the perfect trade. Insurance on risky home mortgages was trading at dirt-cheap prices. He would buy boatloads of credit-default swaps—or investments that served as insurance on risky mortgage debt. When housing hit the skids and homeowners defaulted on their mortgages, this insurance would rise in value—and Mr. Paulson would make a killing. If he could convince enough investors to back him, he could start a fund dedicated to this trade.

The Risks of the Trade

Looking back at Zuckerman’s book I take another look at Paolo Pellegrini. He was the analyst who performed much of the grunt work but now looking back and knowing he turned informant his shaky past is worth revisiting. Before Paulson Pellegrini appeared to be done in the industry but he was determined and fit in at Paulson & Co. The book is insightful to how the trade was formulated, followed through and delivered the billions in profit. Zuckerman's work is both insightful and gripping.

This was no given, in hindsight it was so obvious but in reality there was much uncertainty surrounding Paulson’s negative real estate trade. This should be understood when people criticize Paulson’s role in the Abacus CDO which is the focus of the SEC v. Goldman lawsuit. Zuckerman in his book described the John Paulson and Paolo Pellegrini confidence in their CDS positions;Paulson and the others lost tens of millions of dollars initially as real estate and stocks continued to soar unabated. Paulson held firm and increased his exposure.

“In truth, Paulson and Pellegrini still were unsure if their growing trade would ever pan out. They thought the CDOs and other risky mortgage debt would become worthless, Paulson says. ‘But we still didn’t know.’”

This shouldn’t surprise those that have studied the great trades through history. Given the constrain nature of them. They tend to be the most nerve raking and the most difficult to hold. Paulson ‘Greatest Trade’ was no different.

Behind the Greatest Trade

There were a number of unique factors coming together to form the perfect storm for the perfect trade.

CDO ballooned Subprime debt, to put this in perspective by the end of 2006 the subprime loan market was relatively large at around $1.2 trillion (representing around 10% of the overall mortgage market). However this quickly ballooned with CDOs to more than $5 trillion.

A total breakdown on loan compliance as the housing market took off, greed took over with mortgage brokers and bankers turning a blind eye to loan qualification. What was to become known as “Liar Loans” and ‘ninja loans’. Liar loans were loans based on stated income using the honor system with no background checks. “Ninja loans” referred to no income, no job, and no assets.

The other part of the subprime bubble recipe was the there being no down payments required. By 2005 24% of all mortgages were completed with no down payment. The percentage of first-time home buyers with no down payment was even higher an astonishing 43%. In 2001 no down payments loans were approximately 3%.

The result is summed up in the ‘the Greatest Trade”

"By the middle of 2009, a record one in 10 Americans was delinquent or in foreclosure on their mortgages. U.S. housing prices had fallen more than 30% from their 2006 peak. In cities such as Miami, Phoenix, and Las Vegas, real-estate values dropped more than 40%. Several million people lost their homes. And more than 30% of U.S. home owners held mortgages that were underwater, or greater than the value of their houses, the highest level in 75 years."

The rest is history with Paulson making over $20 billion, subprime collapsing and the fallout growing with the SEC charging Goldman Sachs and one of it's employees for Fraud over the Abacus CDO. This is the story of John Paulson and the greatest trade ever, well worth buying the book and reading it. The market awaits for the next greatest trade and the future direcition of John Paulson.

Comments on The Greatest Trade Ever

msorensson profile image

msorensson Level 3 Commenter 2 years ago

Wow..thanks, Billy!!

billyaustindillon profile image

billyaustindillon Hub Author 2 years ago

Melinda pretty impressive trade huh ? The fact it wasn't instant profits and was going against the tide makes it impressive, particularly in light of the SEC v. Goldman Sachs case.

Micky Dee profile image

Micky Dee Level 4 Commenter 2 years ago

Thanks Billy. I just hate them all. Gee that's such a strong word. Let me think... Yeah, I hate every damn one of them. Thanks for a very good read!

billyaustindillon profile image

billyaustindillon Hub Author 2 years ago

Thanks Micky - it is just extraordinary the sheer magnitude of the profits and what they do to get there. Clearly all perception with the masses is gone and it is but a game. Hate is a strong word but as they say it is what it is....

Dave Mathews profile image

Dave Mathews Level 7 Commenter 2 years ago

Billy, I see the old adages still apply. "It takes money to make money." "Money goes to money" of course it doesn't hurt, to have insider knowledge either.

Dave.

billyaustindillon profile image

billyaustindillon Hub Author 2 years ago

Yes I agree Dave, probably more than ever since the global crisis and socialist governments extra scares the money to be around money etc also. That insider knowledge gets out of control, when you read the allegations in the Goldman case it is pretty disgraceful - there needs to be more than just a slap on the wrist for that one.

tradingxyz profile image

tradingxyz 2 years ago

interesting post..

tradingxyz profile image

tradingxyz 2 years ago

the press has made Paulson Godlike over the past few years...I wonder if he has morals and ethics? For his sake, I hope so...but the question remains...is he lucky? or crooked? Time reveals truths...

billyaustindillon profile image

billyaustindillon Hub Author 2 years ago

Thanks tradingxyz for your comments - Paulson has been lauded and it was at a time where he was one of the few who predicted the outcome and made serious money from it. Whether he has moral and ethics it is hard to know. There is always an ounce of luck in market timing with such leverage but he had the rationale and delivery so was a great trade IMO. Whether he got tempted to manipulate near the end before the collapse with instruments like Abacus is up in the air.

Peter Rice Byrne 4 weeks ago

It was the 2% bets on the CDS bonds of the CDO which you could look at in the tranches and their credit ratings so you knew they would fail with 14% bond loss value. Rubin and Summers and the Federal Reserve guy got Clinton to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act so you could turn Investment houses like Goldman Sachs into casinos.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working